I defeated 1756 rated player in 8 moves
I defeated 1728 rated player in 25 moves. He played opening well but blundered queen on move 25.
PS: Is it possible to reach 1700+ rating with good opening prepration?
I defeated 1740 rated opponent. After 39...a3 I felt loosing and was almost tempted to resign.
My opponent left the game once he blundered checkmate on move 27. How can someone who played opening and middlegame so nicely made terrible blunder leading to checkmate in 3. Mere memorization of opening?
I defeated 1694 rated opponent in 12 moves with 10+5 time control. My clock didn't even go below 10 minutes.
How can 1779 rated opponent play 26 opening moves without even a single mistake and then commits back to back blunder? Usage of unfair means?
I don't know why my 1741 rated opponent wanted to keep his queen towards my kingside even though I had enough pieces surrounding my king. His 10 out of total 29 moves were queen moves. On move 18 he was planning for Qxg7# but I ruined his game with 18...Bf6, an intermediate move, before capturing knight on 20...Bxg5.
I had bad position in middlegame. But I didn't give up. I missed few tactics.
During opening, my opponent transposed into french defence. On move 21, I missed mate in 5. After move 22.Qxg2 I wanted my opponent to commit blunder by grabbing rook 22...Qxd4 because then I win queen with discovered check 23.Bf6+!
I defeated 1761 rated player even when he forcefully tried to exchange Queen.
I didn't give up after loosing queen on move 14 and delivered a beautiful blow to opponent king to win in 35 moves.
My 1730 rated opponent abandoned the game when he start loosing.
Play 1...h6 against anything. All you need is superior tactic and better endgame technique.
I checkmated my 1714 rated opponent in 22 moves. Although I missed an opportunity to win a knight on move 18 with Bxa8!
See why it is dangerous to keep king in center. Although I missed Rook sacrifice Rxe6+ multiple times, I found it on move 23 to deliver checkmate with a pawn.
I missed some opportunities once queens were off the board. But I thought bishop and knight fir two pawns would give me advantage.
My 1804 rated opponent blundered bishop. He was out of opening preparation? Are these players memorizing openings or using database?
Opponent king was in continuous threat. Got 6 checks since move 12 upto move 20.
I defeated 1798 rated player. Once I was up an exchange, I force queen trade to transition into an endgame where my flank passed pawn would outplay knight.
My 1746 rated opponent tried to be super aggressive but gave up when he found there are no more perpetual checks. Even though he has passed pawn, he resigned. May be he was looking at engine analysis during the game!
My 1781 rated opponent blitz out move till end when he got two pawn down and finally resigned.
I missed 17...Bb3, as I was thinking of attacking King, which was still in the centre. See what happened next.
I never thought that my opponent would blunder queen on move 12. I was about to play 12... Bc5 .
My opponent tried to trick me with 32. Rh7 so that after Qxh7 33. Qxe8 is checkmate.
My 1817 rated opponent was playing too fast. Overconfidence?
Bxf7+ followed by Qxe4 was psychological move, so that I would capture Qxf1 instead of Qxe4? Comment.
My opponent offered a draw in endgame when both of us had a rook. But my opponent blundered and I was able to win.
Win in caro kann panov attack without any blunder. Although I unnecessarily sacrifice the rook.
My opponent abandon the game on 5th move. Probably they are looking at computer analysis after the move?
When you are out of preparation in the very first move of opening, and still you beat 1748 rated player with zero blunders and 95% accuracy!
My opponent played counter gambit 2...f5 in response to 1.e5 e5 2.d4 and I win game in 21 moves with 97% accuracy and zero blunder.
A 1732 player blunder queen and I missed to capture it. Later I realized that I have missed it once I have played the move.
My opponent had pressure throughout the game. But computer analysis says he committed four blunders and me just one! Why my opponent lost??
I missed multiple chances to win material. But does it really matter? Because I win finally.
I win quickly in center game because opponent don't know what to do and it is not a new opening at all.
I missed out fork on my queen and rook 25...Ng3, but I realized that I can get away with fork with 26. Qf7+. However, I missed mate in one.
I just defeated a 1795 player on lichess in 20 moves. This is why opening preparation can catch your opponent in surprise. I am out of theory on move 10th, but by playing logically, I am able to follow theory till move 12th, up to which there are some games played in the past. See link below:
Today I defeated a 1700 player on lichess but I blundered mate which my opponent missed.
I win quickly in center game (gambit line). See timestamps in analysis board. I played fast.
I don't have any repertoire against English opening. I just tried flank opening with a pawn gambit.
Does a pair of Rooks dominate a pair of Bishops? My opponent thought that it is good to trade Queens once he is a pawn up!!!
I have been playing center game quite a while now. I should have played e5 on move 7. But because I have still not developed my repertoire, I tried to go for an attack on f7 pawn.
Today I played chess game till end. You can see evaluation that initially it is in favor of my opponent but. Queen and a rook is off the board. But then I decided to push g pawn and trade some pawns. In the process I open up opponent king side as well.
I support bangladeshi hindu. I condem their killing. I demand Indian government to send army in bangladesh and capture entire bangladesh immediately
Anyone in distress and want free remedy advice as per vedic horoscope, give your birth detail in comment section with your email id. Comment will NOT be published and your detail will be safe. All communication will be through email.
People might be using computer during their game on lichess. In the following game my opponent resigned once they moved knight back to f3. He might be using computer to cross check move once he has played that move on board.
See, my opponent keep gaining small advantages every move till middlegame and then started blundering. Either they are very good at openings or they are cheating (using engine analysis) and stop using it at the end of game to save themselves from being caught.
Some player might use computer analysis in critical phase of game. Online chess has no credibility.
I didn't blunder in this game although I missed few tactics. I have been playing fast which I believe is not best thing.
I have been playing online chess games on lichess.com for a while. When I am above 1700 ELO, I started encountering players who would play just extraordinary. Today also same thing happened. But when I told guy that he or she was using computer analysis, he just started doing blunders. People use computer analysis while playing 10 minute+ games on lichess. At around move 20, I accused opponent of cheating and then he started doing blunders.
Pawn endings are very concrete – even the tiniest change in the position generally alters the shape and outcome of the struggle. Here you can rarely get along on “general principles”.
The study of pawn endings chiefly boils down, not to the memorization of exact positions, but to the assimilation of standard techniques, which considerably eases our search for a solution and the calculation of variations.
Many pawn endings are clearly defined tempo-battles. In these endgames, speed is everything: which pawn will queen first, will the king come in time to stop the passed pawn or get to the other side of the board in time. And there are other pawn endings in which a maneuvering war predominates, and in which zugzwang assumes paramount importance.
In King and pawn endings, the difference of a single tempo is often the deciding factor. Having an extra move in a pawn race can mean victory or defeat Interestingly enough, there are some King and pawn endings in which you want your opponent to be on the move, so you want to lose a tempo!
The endgame poses very different problems and needs than the other phases of game. In the endgame, pawns and Kings take on enormous significance. Since the threat to the Kings is no longer real (the enemy limited army no longer poses any danger to his Majesty), King should be used actively in endgame.
Though White cannot mate with a King and lone pawn, he CAN promote his pawn to a Queen. As a result of this fact, every King and pawn vs. King situation is all about one thing: can the pawn promote?
Most players handle these endings with confidence, but some have trouble in less common positions. Very often the problem lies in the overuse of the theory of the opposition. While opposition is a very useful concept and its best field of application is Pawn endings , its value is sometimes overestimated.
The first question we have to answer in King + Pawn vs. King endings is this : Can the pawn promote without the aid of the king? Calculating the race between the pawn and the enemy king is enough to answer this question. This calculation is not complicated but, anyway, experience has taught us a simple way to solve the problem at a glance : the so-called 'rule of the square'.
Imagine a square having for one of its sides the path from the pawn to its queening square. (One easy way to construct the square is to draw a diagonal from the pawn to its promotion rank and then complete the square.) If the king stands within the square of the passed pawn, or can reach it on its move, the pawn can be stopped; otherwise, it will queen.
Today game... Win at ruy lopez.
How to tackle wild game play? Just be patient. Wait for your chance. Improve slowly. Let opponent do blunder. When up material, trade pieces. Push passed pawn. Don't do anything crazy. And at last you laugh... Hahahaha
World is addicted to all kind of bad things like narcotics, illicit relation, video games, armaments. This is taking troll on mother nature. To save earth, we need to get rid of addiction. I am going to provide free counselling to people who seriously want to improve and get rid of bad things. Please drop a comment for any help or suggestions.
Consider life as stock market and addiction as your loss.
If anyone interested in chess endgame training, or would like to talk on chess in general, drop me message in comment section. Right now I am providing it for free.
Check my post on bishop and knight endgame here. Also, please suggest any improvement I can make in my blogsite.
Have a look at game I played with closed Sicilian today.
Won the game even when I blundered in opening. On move 11 I should have castled instead of playing d4. I found two game in chessbase database (search here) in which black played a6 on move 9.
See this is why you need to learn endgame rather than opening. I did few mistakes in middlegame but is able to win endgame. I didn't played endgame perfectly but because I knew knight pawn is a draw if I follow some principles than I was able to convert draw into win. Thanks levy rozman (gothamchess) for his endgame video (see video below game).
Another quick game. Is this opening known as pirc defense? By the way, I never memorize opening. I am playing as white. I just follwed one opening principle: try to gain space at center because pieces usually maneuver easily through center. Black blundered knight and resigned. Computer analysis says 9.f5 a blunder and suggest e5 as best move. But why knight should move to h5 after pawn to e5 and sac on f4? Isn't 9.e5 Ne8 ok for black?
Today I won queen in budapest gambit. Thanks to GM Igor Smirnov (his youtube video is given below).
Hello everyone
I found very good book on pawn structure. Chess structures - A grandmaster guide by Mauricio Flores Rios.
Do you want me to make pgn? I will be able to make chapter wise only and that too over the time horizon of 3-4 years. Which opening you want me to target first? Personally I feel I should first cover french defense but in the book author has repeatedly referred to previous chapters so it would be a good idea to start sequentially with chapter 1. What are your opinion? Please feel free to comment.
PS:
Sorry some files of below mentioned post got deleted. I am able to recover only 3 of those.
https://kuldhirblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/chess-endgame-books-pgn-files.html
Today morning I played a game of chess on lichess.org. After opting for computer analysis, I found that lichess computer analysis suggested incorrect Knight move on 29th move. On move 29, lichess computer analysis suggest Nd3 but White should actually move either of King or Queen to avoid fork by my knight on e2.
Check this game here.