My 1709 rated opponent was blitzing out moves.
Opponent king was in continuous threat. Got 6 checks since move 12 upto move 20.
I defeated 1798 rated player. Once I was up an exchange, I force queen trade to transition into an endgame where my flank passed pawn would outplay knight.
My 1746 rated opponent tried to be super aggressive but gave up when he found there are no more perpetual checks. Even though he has passed pawn, he resigned. May be he was looking at engine analysis during the game!
My 1781 rated opponent blitz out move till end when he got two pawn down and finally resigned.
I missed 17...Bb3, as I was thinking of attacking King, which was still in the centre. See what happened next.
I never thought that my opponent would blunder queen on move 12. I was about to play 12... Bc5 .
My opponent tried to trick me with 32. Rh7 so that after Qxh7 33. Qxe8 is checkmate.
My 1817 rated opponent was playing too fast. Overconfidence?
Bxf7+ followed by Qxe4 was psychological move, so that I would capture Qxf1 instead of Qxe4? Comment.
My opponent offered a draw in endgame when both of us had a rook. But my opponent blundered and I was able to win.
Win in caro kann panov attack without any blunder. Although I unnecessarily sacrifice the rook.
My opponent abandon the game on 5th move. Probably they are looking at computer analysis after the move?
When you are out of preparation in the very first move of opening, and still you beat 1748 rated player with zero blunders and 95% accuracy!
My opponent played counter gambit 2...f5 in response to 1.e5 e5 2.d4 and I win game in 21 moves with 97% accuracy and zero blunder.
A 1732 player blunder queen and I missed to capture it. Later I realized that I have missed it once I have played the move.
My opponent had pressure throughout the game. But computer analysis says he committed four blunders and me just one! Why my opponent lost??
I missed multiple chances to win material. But does it really matter? Because I win finally.