I made lot of mistakes but didn't blunder.
Win in caro kann panov attack without any blunder. Although I unnecessarily sacrifice the rook.
My opponent abandon the game on 5th move. Probably they are looking at computer analysis after the move?
When you are out of preparation in the very first move of opening, and still you beat 1748 rated player with zero blunders and 95% accuracy!
My opponent played counter gambit 2...f5 in response to 1.e5 e5 2.d4 and I win game in 21 moves with 97% accuracy and zero blunder.
A 1732 player blunder queen and I missed to capture it. Later I realized that I have missed it once I have played the move.
My opponent had pressure throughout the game. But computer analysis says he committed four blunders and me just one! Why my opponent lost??
I missed multiple chances to win material. But does it really matter? Because I win finally.